<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 18 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439745</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, vacating the penalty of Rs. 4,17,900/- imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. This decision was based on the allowance of the quantum appeal regarding the deduction under section 54F, which favored the assessee. The tribunal concluded that since the deduction was granted in the quantum appeal, the penalty could not be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2023 11:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=718249" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 18 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439745</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, vacating the penalty of Rs. 4,17,900/- imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. This decision was based on the allowance of the quantum appeal regarding the deduction under section 54F, which favored the assessee. The tribunal concluded that since the deduction was granted in the quantum appeal, the penalty could not be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439745</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>