https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308511 The court dismissed the petition challenging territorial jurisdiction, lack of inquiry under section 202 Cr.P.C., and the defense of cheques given as security. It also rejected the argument against clubbing more than three cheques in a complaint under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court deemed the petition an abuse of process, imposing a cost of Rs. 30,000 on the petitioners. The ex-parte interim order was vacated, and the Metropolitan Magistrate was directed to complete the trial within six months. The parties were instructed to appear before the Metropolitan Magistrate on 18th November, 2013. en-us Fri, 01 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 30 Jun 2023 17:14:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308511 The court dismissed the petition challenging territorial jurisdiction, lack of inquiry under section 202 Cr.P.C., and the defense of cheques given as security. It also rejected the argument against clubbing more than three cheques in a complaint under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court deemed the petition an abuse of process, imposing a cost of Rs. 30,000 on the petitioners. The ex-parte interim order was vacated, and the Metropolitan Magistrate was directed to complete the trial within six months. The parties were instructed to appear before the Metropolitan Magistrate on 18th November, 2013. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 01 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308511