<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 864 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308510</link>
    <description>The court upheld the validity of the ISI prescription endorsement on the manufacturing license, classified the products as misbranded cosmetics, and affirmed the applicability of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act and Rules. The summoning order was deemed legal, allowing the prosecution to proceed. The petition challenging the summoning order was dismissed, emphasizing the responsibility of branded companies to maintain public trust and highlighting the importance of conforming to safety standards for public health.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2023 12:33:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=718191" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 864 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308510</link>
      <description>The court upheld the validity of the ISI prescription endorsement on the manufacturing license, classified the products as misbranded cosmetics, and affirmed the applicability of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act and Rules. The summoning order was deemed legal, allowing the prosecution to proceed. The petition challenging the summoning order was dismissed, emphasizing the responsibility of branded companies to maintain public trust and highlighting the importance of conforming to safety standards for public health.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308510</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>