https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308509 The Court ruled in favor of the appellant, a public servant prosecuted under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, finding the prosecution without sanction under section 197 of the CrPC illegal due to the lack of approval from the State Government. The Court upheld that prosecution post-retirement without prior sanction is impermissible, following a precedent. In a separate case, the Court questioned the competence of the authority granting sanction for proceedings under the same Act, granting the petitioner time to provide further evidence and adjourning the matter. en-us Wed, 21 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 30 Jun 2023 11:11:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308509 The Court ruled in favor of the appellant, a public servant prosecuted under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, finding the prosecution without sanction under section 197 of the CrPC illegal due to the lack of approval from the State Government. The Court upheld that prosecution post-retirement without prior sanction is impermissible, following a precedent. In a separate case, the Court questioned the competence of the authority granting sanction for proceedings under the same Act, granting the petitioner time to provide further evidence and adjourning the matter. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 21 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308509