<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Assessee Successfully Challenges Additions u/s 68; AO and CIT(A) Faulted for Dismissing Evidence Without Inquiry.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=70668</link>
    <description>Additions u/s 68 - Low profit ratio - the assessee has discharged his onus before the revenue authorities. AO and the ld. CIT(A) rejected the explanation of the assessee solely based on the limited issue of low profit - There were no enquiries made nor any evidence to reject the documents/evidences filed by the assessee - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2023 10:15:25 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2023 10:15:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=718174" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Assessee Successfully Challenges Additions u/s 68; AO and CIT(A) Faulted for Dismissing Evidence Without Inquiry.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=70668</link>
      <description>Additions u/s 68 - Low profit ratio - the assessee has discharged his onus before the revenue authorities. AO and the ld. CIT(A) rejected the explanation of the assessee solely based on the limited issue of low profit - There were no enquiries made nor any evidence to reject the documents/evidences filed by the assessee - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2023 10:15:25 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=70668</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>