<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 1266 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439692</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The penalty was deleted as the Revenue failed to establish willful concealment of income, emphasizing that quantum proceedings do not automatically justify penalties. The order was pronounced on 31/03/2023 at Ahmedabad.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2023 09:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=718131" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 1266 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439692</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The penalty was deleted as the Revenue failed to establish willful concealment of income, emphasizing that quantum proceedings do not automatically justify penalties. The order was pronounced on 31/03/2023 at Ahmedabad.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439692</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>