https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439687 The HC condoned a 41-day delay in filing the appeal against the Tribunal's order, which had set aside the Principal Commissioner of Customs' decision under the Customs Broker Licensing Regulations, 2018. The Tribunal found no substantial violation of regulations 10(d) and 10(n) by the Customs Broker, as they had verified documents via a government website. The Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, dismissing the revenue's appeal, as no substantial question of law was present, and clarified that this dismissal did not affect any pending challenges to previous orders. en-us Mon, 26 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 02 Feb 2024 12:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439687 The HC condoned a 41-day delay in filing the appeal against the Tribunal's order, which had set aside the Principal Commissioner of Customs' decision under the Customs Broker Licensing Regulations, 2018. The Tribunal found no substantial violation of regulations 10(d) and 10(n) by the Customs Broker, as they had verified documents via a government website. The Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, dismissing the revenue's appeal, as no substantial question of law was present, and clarified that this dismissal did not affect any pending challenges to previous orders. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 26 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439687