https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439672 The Tribunal held in favor of the appellant, finding that the demand for business auxiliary services and technical inspection and certification services was not sustainable due to limitations and merit. The appellant's bonafide belief, supported by relevant decisions, and the exemption under Notification No. 41/2007-ST were key factors in the decision. The judgment, delivered by Members (Judicial) and (Technical) of the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Kolkata, set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal with consequential relief on 28 June 2023. en-us Wed, 28 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 Jun 2023 21:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439672 The Tribunal held in favor of the appellant, finding that the demand for business auxiliary services and technical inspection and certification services was not sustainable due to limitations and merit. The appellant's bonafide belief, supported by relevant decisions, and the exemption under Notification No. 41/2007-ST were key factors in the decision. The judgment, delivered by Members (Judicial) and (Technical) of the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Kolkata, set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal with consequential relief on 28 June 2023. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 28 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439672