<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 1244 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439670</link>
    <description>The appeal was filed against an Order-In-Original confirming a differential service tax on various services, along with interest and penalty. The Tribunal found the admitted demand to be sustainable but remanded the matter back to the Adjudicating Authority for re-quantification and review of penalty imposition. The appeal was allowed for a fresh order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2023 09:34:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=718099" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 1244 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439670</link>
      <description>The appeal was filed against an Order-In-Original confirming a differential service tax on various services, along with interest and penalty. The Tribunal found the admitted demand to be sustainable but remanded the matter back to the Adjudicating Authority for re-quantification and review of penalty imposition. The appeal was allowed for a fresh order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439670</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>