https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439662 Exemption benefits under the cited notifications were treated as available without production of C Forms where the controversy was already covered by the earlier binding decision in Prism Cement and the connected follow-on orders. The Bombay High Court noted that no stay operated against that precedent and applied the same view to the subsequent petition. On that basis, the impugned order denying exemption could not be sustained, and the earlier binding ruling controlled the outcome in the later matter. en-us Mon, 26 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 Jun 2023 13:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439662 Exemption benefits under the cited notifications were treated as available without production of C Forms where the controversy was already covered by the earlier binding decision in Prism Cement and the connected follow-on orders. The Bombay High Court noted that no stay operated against that precedent and applied the same view to the subsequent petition. On that basis, the impugned order denying exemption could not be sustained, and the earlier binding ruling controlled the outcome in the later matter. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 26 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439662