<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 1540 - THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308490</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the interim order issued by the Delisting Committee, ruling that the appellant must pay annual listing fees during the suspension period and reinstatement fees for revocation. The appeal was dismissed, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s non-compliance with listing requirements and the regulatory framework&#039;s obligations. The tribunal found no grounds to overturn the interim order, with no costs awarded to either party.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2023 20:58:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=718085" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 1540 - THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308490</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the interim order issued by the Delisting Committee, ruling that the appellant must pay annual listing fees during the suspension period and reinstatement fees for revocation. The appeal was dismissed, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s non-compliance with listing requirements and the regulatory framework&#039;s obligations. The tribunal found no grounds to overturn the interim order, with no costs awarded to either party.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308490</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>