https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308490 Suspension of trading did not terminate listing status, so the listed entity remained bound by the exchange regulations, listing agreement and applicable SEBI framework to pay annual listing fees while suspension continued. The same regulatory and contractual framework also supported levy of a reinstatement fee as a condition for revocation of suspension. The challenge failed because the obligation attached to continued listing, not to active trading, and the company had undertaken to pay the prescribed fees for continued listing and re-admission to trading. en-us Thu, 24 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 Jun 2023 20:58:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308490 Suspension of trading did not terminate listing status, so the listed entity remained bound by the exchange regulations, listing agreement and applicable SEBI framework to pay annual listing fees while suspension continued. The same regulatory and contractual framework also supported levy of a reinstatement fee as a condition for revocation of suspension. The challenge failed because the obligation attached to continued listing, not to active trading, and the company had undertaken to pay the prescribed fees for continued listing and re-admission to trading. Case-Laws SEBI Thu, 24 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308490