<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 1474 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308501</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed a review petition regarding the interpretation of Section 7(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The Court reaffirmed that the adjudicating authority has the power to admit or reject an application under this section, with no provision for compelling parties to settle disputes. It clarified that the issue was not about mandatory versus discretionary provisions but rather about the authority&#039;s ability to impose a settlement on unwilling parties. The Court emphasized that judicial interpretations are case-specific and not equivalent to statutory provisions, ultimately upholding the original judgment and disposing of the review petition and any pending applications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2023 20:58:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=718072" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 1474 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308501</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed a review petition regarding the interpretation of Section 7(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The Court reaffirmed that the adjudicating authority has the power to admit or reject an application under this section, with no provision for compelling parties to settle disputes. It clarified that the issue was not about mandatory versus discretionary provisions but rather about the authority&#039;s ability to impose a settlement on unwilling parties. The Court emphasized that judicial interpretations are case-specific and not equivalent to statutory provisions, ultimately upholding the original judgment and disposing of the review petition and any pending applications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308501</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>