https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308487 The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the first respondent, allowing his admission to the LL.B. course based on possessing a Master's degree, even though a Bachelor's degree was the usual prerequisite. Despite the lack of recognition of his distance education degree, the Court directed the university to treat his admission as regular and permitted him to continue the course and sit for examinations, citing fairness and non-retrospective denial of admission benefits. en-us Tue, 21 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 Jun 2023 17:56:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308487 The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the first respondent, allowing his admission to the LL.B. course based on possessing a Master's degree, even though a Bachelor's degree was the usual prerequisite. Despite the lack of recognition of his distance education degree, the Court directed the university to treat his admission as regular and permitted him to continue the course and sit for examinations, citing fairness and non-retrospective denial of admission benefits. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 21 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308487