<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 96 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33171</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing that the Tribunal had no powers of review and rectification as there was no error apparent on record. The judgment clarified that rectification is only allowed in the presence of such an error and highlighted the importance of adhering to established legal principles in tax matters. As a result, the Appeal was dismissed due to the absence of a substantial question of law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71806" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 96 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33171</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing that the Tribunal had no powers of review and rectification as there was no error apparent on record. The judgment clarified that rectification is only allowed in the presence of such an error and highlighted the importance of adhering to established legal principles in tax matters. As a result, the Appeal was dismissed due to the absence of a substantial question of law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33171</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>