https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308486 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision that the petitioner's establishment qualified as a "shop" under the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948. The Court emphasized liberal construction of the Act to fulfill legislative intent and welfare objectives. As the petitioner employed over 20 individuals and engaged in selling activities at its premises, it was obligated to comply with the Act's requirements. The petition was dismissed, affirming the Act's applicability to the petitioner's establishment. en-us Tue, 18 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 Jun 2023 17:15:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308486 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision that the petitioner's establishment qualified as a "shop" under the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948. The Court emphasized liberal construction of the Act to fulfill legislative intent and welfare objectives. As the petitioner employed over 20 individuals and engaged in selling activities at its premises, it was obligated to comply with the Act's requirements. The petition was dismissed, affirming the Act's applicability to the petitioner's establishment. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 18 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308486