<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (8) TMI 458 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308486</link>
    <description>A premises from which import sales were facilitated, delivery and unloading were supervised, sale proceeds were collected, and remittances were made to foreign principals was treated as a &quot;shop&quot; for the Employees&#039; State Insurance Act notification. Because the Act and notification did not define &quot;shop&quot;, the expression was given a liberal construction in line with the welfare purpose of the legislation. The fact that goods were not physically delivered at the premises did not prevent it from being regarded as a trading centre. The establishment was therefore covered by the notification and statutory contributions were payable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2023 17:15:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=718058" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (8) TMI 458 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308486</link>
      <description>A premises from which import sales were facilitated, delivery and unloading were supervised, sale proceeds were collected, and remittances were made to foreign principals was treated as a &quot;shop&quot; for the Employees&#039; State Insurance Act notification. Because the Act and notification did not define &quot;shop&quot;, the expression was given a liberal construction in line with the welfare purpose of the legislation. The fact that goods were not physically delivered at the premises did not prevent it from being regarded as a trading centre. The establishment was therefore covered by the notification and statutory contributions were payable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308486</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>