https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308485 The Court modified interim orders in a case involving duty liability and interim reliefs against petitioners challenging preliminary findings on imports. The Director General Safeguards sought payment of liability covered under executed bonds. An amendment to the Customs Tariff Act was highlighted, arguing for vacating or modifying previous orders. The petitioners claimed the impugned notification had retrospective effect. The Court, finding a prima facie case for the petitioners, directed them to provide additional security with a bank guarantee alongside existing bonds. The modified orders would persist during the petition's pendency, with civil applications disposed of without costs. en-us Fri, 11 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 Jun 2023 16:52:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308485 The Court modified interim orders in a case involving duty liability and interim reliefs against petitioners challenging preliminary findings on imports. The Director General Safeguards sought payment of liability covered under executed bonds. An amendment to the Customs Tariff Act was highlighted, arguing for vacating or modifying previous orders. The petitioners claimed the impugned notification had retrospective effect. The Court, finding a prima facie case for the petitioners, directed them to provide additional security with a bank guarantee alongside existing bonds. The modified orders would persist during the petition's pendency, with civil applications disposed of without costs. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 11 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308485