<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 1231 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439657</link>
    <description>The SC modified a 200% penalty imposed for an expired e-Way Bill. Upon finding the penalty excessive, the court reduced it to Rs.50,000 covering both CGST and WBGST. The appellants were directed to pay from their bank guarantee, with authorities to discharge the remaining balance upon payment, recognizing the technical violation while providing proportionate relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 18:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=718006" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 1231 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439657</link>
      <description>The SC modified a 200% penalty imposed for an expired e-Way Bill. Upon finding the penalty excessive, the court reduced it to Rs.50,000 covering both CGST and WBGST. The appellants were directed to pay from their bank guarantee, with authorities to discharge the remaining balance upon payment, recognizing the technical violation while providing proportionate relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439657</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>