<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 1227 - PATIALA HOUSE COURTS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439653</link>
    <description>Territorial jurisdiction to entertain an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is not limited to the place where the alleged offence occurred. The relevant test is whether the applicant has a reasonable apprehension of arrest within the territorial jurisdiction of the court approached. Applying that principle and the cited precedent on concurrent jurisdiction, the court held that the place where arrest was apprehended was sufficient to confer jurisdiction to hear the application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 10:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=718002" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 1227 - PATIALA HOUSE COURTS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439653</link>
      <description>Territorial jurisdiction to entertain an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is not limited to the place where the alleged offence occurred. The relevant test is whether the applicant has a reasonable apprehension of arrest within the territorial jurisdiction of the court approached. Applying that principle and the cited precedent on concurrent jurisdiction, the court held that the place where arrest was apprehended was sufficient to confer jurisdiction to hear the application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439653</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>