<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 1200 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439626</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and directing the appeal to be allowed. The decision emphasized that the assessable value should not be solely based on Light Displacement Tonnage (LDT) when the contract price is a lump sum not in proportion to LDT. Without evidence of extra consideration paid, the transaction value declared by the importer must be accepted, as LDT is irrelevant for duty assessment in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2023 09:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=717975" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 1200 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439626</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and directing the appeal to be allowed. The decision emphasized that the assessable value should not be solely based on Light Displacement Tonnage (LDT) when the contract price is a lump sum not in proportion to LDT. Without evidence of extra consideration paid, the transaction value declared by the importer must be accepted, as LDT is irrelevant for duty assessment in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439626</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>