https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439618 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Kolkata ruled in favor of the Appellant in a case involving duty demand, classification of intermediate excisable product, exemption under Notification No. 214/86, extended limitation period, and interpretation of Rule 4(5)(a) of the Cenvat Credit Rules. The Tribunal allowed the appeal based on the clearance for job work, exemption, and limitation, citing previous decisions and communication with the department. en-us Mon, 26 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Jun 2023 18:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439618 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Kolkata ruled in favor of the Appellant in a case involving duty demand, classification of intermediate excisable product, exemption under Notification No. 214/86, extended limitation period, and interpretation of Rule 4(5)(a) of the Cenvat Credit Rules. The Tribunal allowed the appeal based on the clearance for job work, exemption, and limitation, citing previous decisions and communication with the department. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 26 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439618