https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308478 The court upheld the suspension order dated 24.08.2020, finding it legal and justified based on prima facie evidence, including voice messages, under Rule 8 of the Andhra Pradesh Civil Services (CCA) Rules, 1991. The court dismissed the writ petition, emphasizing that suspension is a preventive measure, not punitive, to prevent interference with inquiries. It ruled that the suspension did not violate principles of natural justice or constitutional rights, directing periodic review of suspension orders to prevent undue prejudice to the petitioner's career. en-us Thu, 18 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 Jun 2023 08:28:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308478 The court upheld the suspension order dated 24.08.2020, finding it legal and justified based on prima facie evidence, including voice messages, under Rule 8 of the Andhra Pradesh Civil Services (CCA) Rules, 1991. The court dismissed the writ petition, emphasizing that suspension is a preventive measure, not punitive, to prevent interference with inquiries. It ruled that the suspension did not violate principles of natural justice or constitutional rights, directing periodic review of suspension orders to prevent undue prejudice to the petitioner's career. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 18 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308478