<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 821 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308466</link>
    <description>The court held that the Special Judge in Gaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, has jurisdiction to try the case involving embezzlement of funds allocated for the National Rural Health Mission in Uttar Pradesh. The application for anticipatory bail was dismissed by the Delhi court due to lack of territorial jurisdiction, as the offences were committed in Uttar Pradesh.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2023 12:03:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=717907" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 821 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308466</link>
      <description>The court held that the Special Judge in Gaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, has jurisdiction to try the case involving embezzlement of funds allocated for the National Rural Health Mission in Uttar Pradesh. The application for anticipatory bail was dismissed by the Delhi court due to lack of territorial jurisdiction, as the offences were committed in Uttar Pradesh.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308466</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>