https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308464 The court emphasized that both the High Court and Sessions Court have the power to grant anticipatory bail under section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code. It clarified that the High Court within whose jurisdiction the offence is committed or where arrest is apprehended can grant anticipatory bail. In this case, the applicant had previously sought anticipatory bail from the Sessions Court in Bilaspur, which was denied. The court held that the applicant should have approached the High Court of that state after the initial denial. The court dismissed the applicant's plea for anticipatory bail, stressing the importance of judicial propriety and consistency in legal proceedings. en-us Thu, 03 Aug 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Jun 2023 11:28:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308464 The court emphasized that both the High Court and Sessions Court have the power to grant anticipatory bail under section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code. It clarified that the High Court within whose jurisdiction the offence is committed or where arrest is apprehended can grant anticipatory bail. In this case, the applicant had previously sought anticipatory bail from the Sessions Court in Bilaspur, which was denied. The court held that the applicant should have approached the High Court of that state after the initial denial. The court dismissed the applicant's plea for anticipatory bail, stressing the importance of judicial propriety and consistency in legal proceedings. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 03 Aug 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308464