https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308463 The court quashes the criminal complaint against the petitioner for lack of jurisdiction, emphasizing that filing in a jurisdiction without territorial connection constitutes an abuse of court process. The agreements and transactions clearly establish Bhadohi as the relevant place, and the court cites precedent to support its decision. The judgment stresses the importance of territorial jurisdiction in criminal cases and concludes that parties should not be forced to submit to a court's jurisdiction in a distant location. en-us Mon, 28 Aug 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Jun 2023 11:20:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308463 The court quashes the criminal complaint against the petitioner for lack of jurisdiction, emphasizing that filing in a jurisdiction without territorial connection constitutes an abuse of court process. The agreements and transactions clearly establish Bhadohi as the relevant place, and the court cites precedent to support its decision. The judgment stresses the importance of territorial jurisdiction in criminal cases and concludes that parties should not be forced to submit to a court's jurisdiction in a distant location. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 28 Aug 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308463