https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308462 The High Court dismissed the petition for anticipatory bail in a case registered in Madras, emphasizing that its jurisdiction to grant such bail is tied to the location of the offence, not the petitioner's residence. The Court clarified that the critical factor is whether the offence falls within its jurisdiction, as defined by the Code. Previous cases were examined to illustrate the limitations on the High Court's jurisdiction to grant bail in cases registered in other states, leading to the dismissal of the current petition due to lack of jurisdiction. en-us Tue, 09 Aug 1983 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Jun 2023 11:15:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308462 The High Court dismissed the petition for anticipatory bail in a case registered in Madras, emphasizing that its jurisdiction to grant such bail is tied to the location of the offence, not the petitioner's residence. The Court clarified that the critical factor is whether the offence falls within its jurisdiction, as defined by the Code. Previous cases were examined to illustrate the limitations on the High Court's jurisdiction to grant bail in cases registered in other states, leading to the dismissal of the current petition due to lack of jurisdiction. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 09 Aug 1983 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308462