<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 1172 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439598</link>
    <description>Delay in filing the Special Leave Petition was condoned, allowing the matter to be considered on its merits. The Court found no substantial legal error or jurisdictional defect in the impugned order and declined to exercise discretionary special leave jurisdiction, so the order was left undisturbed and the petition dismissed. The substantive question of law raised in the petition was expressly left open, with no adjudication on that issue and no remand for fresh consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 13:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=717872" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 1172 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439598</link>
      <description>Delay in filing the Special Leave Petition was condoned, allowing the matter to be considered on its merits. The Court found no substantial legal error or jurisdictional defect in the impugned order and declined to exercise discretionary special leave jurisdiction, so the order was left undisturbed and the petition dismissed. The substantive question of law raised in the petition was expressly left open, with no adjudication on that issue and no remand for fresh consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439598</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>