<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 1159 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439585</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal with consequential relief. It directed the Revenue to verify the mathematical accuracy of the refund claim before sanctioning it. The Tribunal found the rejection of the refund claim based on an erroneous data entry in the ST-3 Return unjustified. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2024 13:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=717859" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 1159 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439585</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal with consequential relief. It directed the Revenue to verify the mathematical accuracy of the refund claim before sanctioning it. The Tribunal found the rejection of the refund claim based on an erroneous data entry in the ST-3 Return unjustified. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439585</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>