<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 1151 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439577</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit on an imported engine turned on whether the engine was retained and used in the factory for research and development purposes, with the duty-payment document already accepted as valid. The appellant relied on technical material and a test data sheet to support use of the engine for the stated purpose, but the record did not show that this evidence had been independently examined on merits. Further opportunity was therefore considered necessary for the appellant to place all relevant evidence before the appellate authority, and the question of credit admissibility was remitted for fresh consideration without any final merits determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2023 14:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=717851" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 1151 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439577</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit on an imported engine turned on whether the engine was retained and used in the factory for research and development purposes, with the duty-payment document already accepted as valid. The appellant relied on technical material and a test data sheet to support use of the engine for the stated purpose, but the record did not show that this evidence had been independently examined on merits. Further opportunity was therefore considered necessary for the appellant to place all relevant evidence before the appellate authority, and the question of credit admissibility was remitted for fresh consideration without any final merits determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439577</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>