<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 220 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33149</link>
    <description>Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was construed broadly to determine whether items used in a factory qualified as capital goods for Modvat credit. The Court applied a functional test, holding that machines, machinery, plant, equipment, apparatus, tools, appliances, and their components, spare parts or accessories may qualify when they have a direct nexus with the manufacturing process and support or operate the production setup. On that basis, copper/aluminium conductor, impeller, bulldozer and cold frame sections used in the factory were treated as capital goods, and Modvat credit was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71784" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 220 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33149</link>
      <description>Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was construed broadly to determine whether items used in a factory qualified as capital goods for Modvat credit. The Court applied a functional test, holding that machines, machinery, plant, equipment, apparatus, tools, appliances, and their components, spare parts or accessories may qualify when they have a direct nexus with the manufacturing process and support or operate the production setup. On that basis, copper/aluminium conductor, impeller, bulldozer and cold frame sections used in the factory were treated as capital goods, and Modvat credit was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33149</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>