https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439549 The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, substituting the additions upheld by the CIT(A) with a restricted addition of 8% of the total alleged purchases to address potential revenue leakage. The judgment emphasized the importance of factual evidence and the lack of valid reasons for certain additions, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant to some extent. en-us Fri, 23 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Jun 2023 08:10:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439549 The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, substituting the additions upheld by the CIT(A) with a restricted addition of 8% of the total alleged purchases to address potential revenue leakage. The judgment emphasized the importance of factual evidence and the lack of valid reasons for certain additions, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant to some extent. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 23 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439549