https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439528 CESTAT held the appellant not liable to pay differential duty under Rule 8 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000. Relying on HC precedent, the tribunal found no statutory interest payable where duty was not exigible and the matter was revenue-neutral because the sister unit had availed CENVAT credit on amounts paid. The impugned order was set aside and the appeal allowed with consequential relief. en-us Thu, 22 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Oct 2025 10:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439528 CESTAT held the appellant not liable to pay differential duty under Rule 8 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000. Relying on HC precedent, the tribunal found no statutory interest payable where duty was not exigible and the matter was revenue-neutral because the sister unit had availed CENVAT credit on amounts paid. The impugned order was set aside and the appeal allowed with consequential relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 22 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439528