https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439521 The court dismissed the application seeking leave to file an appeal, ruling that the applicant does not qualify as a "person aggrieved" and that the direction to disclose essential facts does not violate the confidentiality clause under Rule 7. The court emphasized the necessity of disclosing key parameters for affected parties to challenge Anti-Dumping Duty decisions. The applicant was advised to seek permission for intervention in the respondent's writ appeal, with no costs awarded. en-us Wed, 21 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Jun 2023 08:08:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439521 The court dismissed the application seeking leave to file an appeal, ruling that the applicant does not qualify as a "person aggrieved" and that the direction to disclose essential facts does not violate the confidentiality clause under Rule 7. The court emphasized the necessity of disclosing key parameters for affected parties to challenge Anti-Dumping Duty decisions. The applicant was advised to seek permission for intervention in the respondent's writ appeal, with no costs awarded. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 21 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439521