<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 1080 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439506</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a sugar manufacturer, in a case concerning the classification of services provided and the applicability of Service Tax. It was found that the appellant did not engage in manpower recruitment or supply agency services as alleged by the Revenue. The Tribunal determined that there was no employer-employee relationship between the appellant and the cane harvesters, who were considered independent contractors. As a result, the demand for Service Tax and penalties imposed were set aside, providing relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2023 08:07:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=717702" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 1080 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439506</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a sugar manufacturer, in a case concerning the classification of services provided and the applicability of Service Tax. It was found that the appellant did not engage in manpower recruitment or supply agency services as alleged by the Revenue. The Tribunal determined that there was no employer-employee relationship between the appellant and the cane harvesters, who were considered independent contractors. As a result, the demand for Service Tax and penalties imposed were set aside, providing relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439506</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>