<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Composite supply</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=118603</link>
    <description>When two distinct legal entities independently supply goods and services, the supplies are ordinarily treated as separate transactions rather than a composite supply; composite characterisation requires a single supplier bundling items. The revenue seeking to aggregate such supplies must bear the burden of proof, and resolution depends on a factual and contractual assessment of the parties&#039; roles, delivery terms, and the economic reality of the arrangement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2023 22:49:59 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:54:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=717699" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Composite supply</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=118603</link>
      <description>When two distinct legal entities independently supply goods and services, the supplies are ordinarily treated as separate transactions rather than a composite supply; composite characterisation requires a single supplier bundling items. The revenue seeking to aggregate such supplies must bear the burden of proof, and resolution depends on a factual and contractual assessment of the parties&#039; roles, delivery terms, and the economic reality of the arrangement.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2023 22:49:59 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=118603</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>