<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 2002 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308432</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the deletion of additions on account of bogus purchases for Rs. 3,56,16,927 for Assessment Year 2009-10 was partly allowed. The Tribunal sustained an addition of Rs. 28,49,354, representing 8% of the bogus purchases, based on the lack of evidence for material delivery and the estimation of a profit element earned by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2023 20:41:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=717696" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 2002 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308432</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the deletion of additions on account of bogus purchases for Rs. 3,56,16,927 for Assessment Year 2009-10 was partly allowed. The Tribunal sustained an addition of Rs. 28,49,354, representing 8% of the bogus purchases, based on the lack of evidence for material delivery and the estimation of a profit element earned by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308432</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>