https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308442 The High Court clarified that it lacked jurisdiction to grant anticipatory bail in a case registered beyond its local limits. The decision was based on the territorial constraints outlined in the Jammu and Kashmir Cr. P. C and the limited enforcement powers of the High Court outside its jurisdiction. The interpretation of relevant sections of the Cr. P. C further supported the conclusion that only courts within the territorial limits could grant bail and try cases effectively. As a result, the petition seeking anticipatory bail for an FIR registered in Madhya Pradesh was deemed not maintainable and dismissed by the Court. en-us Fri, 03 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Jun 2023 20:41:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308442 The High Court clarified that it lacked jurisdiction to grant anticipatory bail in a case registered beyond its local limits. The decision was based on the territorial constraints outlined in the Jammu and Kashmir Cr. P. C and the limited enforcement powers of the High Court outside its jurisdiction. The interpretation of relevant sections of the Cr. P. C further supported the conclusion that only courts within the territorial limits could grant bail and try cases effectively. As a result, the petition seeking anticipatory bail for an FIR registered in Madhya Pradesh was deemed not maintainable and dismissed by the Court. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 03 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308442