https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308441 Section 438 CrPC was treated as broad enough to permit the High Court or Court of Session at the place where arrest is apprehended to consider transit anticipatory bail, even when the FIR is registered in another jurisdiction. The territorial objection was rejected because the existence of concurrent jurisdiction before the court where the FIR is pending does not make the local application non-maintainable. Without examining the merits of the allegations, the court granted limited interim protection from arrest for a short period, subject to cooperation with investigation and other safeguards. en-us Thu, 02 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Jun 2023 20:41:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308441 Section 438 CrPC was treated as broad enough to permit the High Court or Court of Session at the place where arrest is apprehended to consider transit anticipatory bail, even when the FIR is registered in another jurisdiction. The territorial objection was rejected because the existence of concurrent jurisdiction before the court where the FIR is pending does not make the local application non-maintainable. Without examining the merits of the allegations, the court granted limited interim protection from arrest for a short period, subject to cooperation with investigation and other safeguards. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 02 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308441