https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308438 The Calcutta HC noted that the order dated May 15, 2015 was appealable under Section 129A of the Customs Act, and that the challenge should be pursued through the statutory appellate remedy rather than writ jurisdiction. It further stated that an allegation that the order relied on an untested third-party statement without cross-examination did not, on the facts presented, justify writ interference and could be raised as a procedural irregularity in appeal. The Court also indicated that if the appeal is filed within four weeks, the appellate authority should sympathetically consider excluding the court time for limitation and endeavour to dispose of the appeal expeditiously. en-us Wed, 06 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Jun 2023 20:41:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308438 The Calcutta HC noted that the order dated May 15, 2015 was appealable under Section 129A of the Customs Act, and that the challenge should be pursued through the statutory appellate remedy rather than writ jurisdiction. It further stated that an allegation that the order relied on an untested third-party statement without cross-examination did not, on the facts presented, justify writ interference and could be raised as a procedural irregularity in appeal. The Court also indicated that if the appeal is filed within four weeks, the appellate authority should sympathetically consider excluding the court time for limitation and endeavour to dispose of the appeal expeditiously. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 06 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308438