<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 1378 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308437</link>
    <description>In assessments involving share capital and share premium, the assessee discharges the burden under section 68 by producing primary evidence such as balance sheets, bank statements, confirmations, income-tax particulars, ROC records and other supporting material, together with compliance to notices under section 133(6) and examination of an investor director under section 131. On those facts, the identity of the investors, genuineness of the transactions and creditworthiness were accepted, so the section 68 addition was not sustainable. For assessment years before insertion of the proviso to section 68, a closely held company was not required to prove the source of the source in relation to share capital or premium.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2023 20:41:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=717689" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 1378 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308437</link>
      <description>In assessments involving share capital and share premium, the assessee discharges the burden under section 68 by producing primary evidence such as balance sheets, bank statements, confirmations, income-tax particulars, ROC records and other supporting material, together with compliance to notices under section 133(6) and examination of an investor director under section 131. On those facts, the identity of the investors, genuineness of the transactions and creditworthiness were accepted, so the section 68 addition was not sustainable. For assessment years before insertion of the proviso to section 68, a closely held company was not required to prove the source of the source in relation to share capital or premium.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308437</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>