<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 1643 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308436</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai ruled in favor of the appellants, engaged in sugar and molasses manufacturing, in a case where they were alleged to be providing manpower recruitment and supply agency services. The Tribunal found no evidence to support the claim that the appellants were liable for service tax under this category. The demand was not sustained, and the appeal was allowed with any consequential relief, setting aside the impugned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2023 20:41:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=717688" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 1643 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308436</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai ruled in favor of the appellants, engaged in sugar and molasses manufacturing, in a case where they were alleged to be providing manpower recruitment and supply agency services. The Tribunal found no evidence to support the claim that the appellants were liable for service tax under this category. The demand was not sustained, and the appeal was allowed with any consequential relief, setting aside the impugned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308436</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>