<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1953 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308435</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad allowed both appeals filed by the assessee-Appellants in a case concerning the classification of imported goods and the benefit of Notification No. 21/2002-Cus. The Tribunal upheld the assessee-Appellants&#039; classification of the goods under Heading 7204 49 00, rejecting the Department&#039;s classification and enhanced value. The benefit claimed under the notification was granted, resulting in the setting aside of the impugned orders in favor of the assessee-Appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2023 20:41:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=717687" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1953 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308435</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad allowed both appeals filed by the assessee-Appellants in a case concerning the classification of imported goods and the benefit of Notification No. 21/2002-Cus. The Tribunal upheld the assessee-Appellants&#039; classification of the goods under Heading 7204 49 00, rejecting the Department&#039;s classification and enhanced value. The benefit claimed under the notification was granted, resulting in the setting aside of the impugned orders in favor of the assessee-Appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308435</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>