<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 1472 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308444</link>
    <description>The High Court of Calcutta heard an appeal by Revenue under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against an order-in-original. The appeal was admitted on the issue of the validity of Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. Due to the tax effect being below the threshold limit, the appeal was disposed of, preventing recovery from the respondent/assessee. The Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s finding on the rule&#039;s validity, leaving the legal issue open for the Supreme Court&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2023 20:41:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=717684" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 1472 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308444</link>
      <description>The High Court of Calcutta heard an appeal by Revenue under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against an order-in-original. The appeal was admitted on the issue of the validity of Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. Due to the tax effect being below the threshold limit, the appeal was disposed of, preventing recovery from the respondent/assessee. The Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s finding on the rule&#039;s validity, leaving the legal issue open for the Supreme Court&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308444</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>