https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308429 The court held that the High Court and Court of Session have the jurisdiction to grant anticipatory bail outside their territorial limits, as long as the case is registered within their jurisdiction. The judgment emphasized that the High Court's powers are not restricted by territorial boundaries within Jammu and Kashmir, unlike lower courts. Granting anticipatory bail outside the state's jurisdiction could lead to non-compliance with court orders, undermining the legal process. The court dismissed the petition and vacated any interim relief granted to the petitioner, upholding the State's objection. en-us Fri, 12 Nov 1982 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Jun 2023 17:17:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308429 The court held that the High Court and Court of Session have the jurisdiction to grant anticipatory bail outside their territorial limits, as long as the case is registered within their jurisdiction. The judgment emphasized that the High Court's powers are not restricted by territorial boundaries within Jammu and Kashmir, unlike lower courts. Granting anticipatory bail outside the state's jurisdiction could lead to non-compliance with court orders, undermining the legal process. The court dismissed the petition and vacated any interim relief granted to the petitioner, upholding the State's objection. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 12 Nov 1982 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308429