<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 118 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33131</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted M/s. Andal Motors&#039; application for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery of service tax and penalties imposed under sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 for services classified under &#039;Goods Transport Agency&#039;. The Tribunal found that the appellants, as consignees of goods, did not fall under any category liable to pay service tax under the GTA service, as the specific category was not specified in the show-cause notice. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, highlighting that the legislative intent did not support a broad interpretation that would require every buyer of goods to pay tax under the GTA category.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71766" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 118 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33131</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted M/s. Andal Motors&#039; application for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery of service tax and penalties imposed under sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 for services classified under &#039;Goods Transport Agency&#039;. The Tribunal found that the appellants, as consignees of goods, did not fall under any category liable to pay service tax under the GTA service, as the specific category was not specified in the show-cause notice. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, highlighting that the legislative intent did not support a broad interpretation that would require every buyer of goods to pay tax under the GTA category.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33131</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>