<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 822 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308428</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, stating they are not liable to pay service tax on storage charges as recipients of storage services, not service providers. Penalties imposed were deemed unjustified, particularly considering the appellant&#039;s status as a State Government Corporation. The appeal was allowed with relief granted to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2023 15:58:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=717657" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 822 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308428</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, stating they are not liable to pay service tax on storage charges as recipients of storage services, not service providers. Penalties imposed were deemed unjustified, particularly considering the appellant&#039;s status as a State Government Corporation. The appeal was allowed with relief granted to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308428</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>