https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308427 The judgment clarified that High Courts have jurisdiction to grant anticipatory bail for offences committed outside their territorial limits. It emphasized the importance of balancing constitutional guarantees, procedural safeguards, and jurisdiction conferred on High Courts. The court highlighted that anticipatory bail is closely linked to the offence or crime and can be granted by the court where the arrest is sought or where the offence occurred. The specific orders in two cases directed bail conditions if the petitioners were arrested in Kerala, emphasizing availability for interrogation and restrictions on leaving India without permission. The judgment concluded that the accused's residence is not a relevant factor for determining jurisdiction for anticipatory bail. en-us Thu, 27 Sep 1984 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Jun 2023 15:11:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308427 The judgment clarified that High Courts have jurisdiction to grant anticipatory bail for offences committed outside their territorial limits. It emphasized the importance of balancing constitutional guarantees, procedural safeguards, and jurisdiction conferred on High Courts. The court highlighted that anticipatory bail is closely linked to the offence or crime and can be granted by the court where the arrest is sought or where the offence occurred. The specific orders in two cases directed bail conditions if the petitioners were arrested in Kerala, emphasizing availability for interrogation and restrictions on leaving India without permission. The judgment concluded that the accused's residence is not a relevant factor for determining jurisdiction for anticipatory bail. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 27 Sep 1984 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308427