https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308426 The Special Bench concluded that the jurisdiction to grant anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.PC is limited to the High Court or Court of Sessions having territorial jurisdiction over the place of the offense. Applications for anticipatory bail must be entertained by the court where the offense was committed, rejecting the minority view allowing applications where the accused apprehended arrest. All anticipatory bail applications in cases outside the territorial jurisdiction of the Calcutta High Court were to be considered accordingly. en-us Mon, 13 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Jun 2023 15:01:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308426 The Special Bench concluded that the jurisdiction to grant anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.PC is limited to the High Court or Court of Sessions having territorial jurisdiction over the place of the offense. Applications for anticipatory bail must be entertained by the court where the offense was committed, rejecting the minority view allowing applications where the accused apprehended arrest. All anticipatory bail applications in cases outside the territorial jurisdiction of the Calcutta High Court were to be considered accordingly. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 13 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308426