<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Assessing Officer&#039;s Dual Role in Income Tax: Investigator vs. Adjudicator u/ss 147, 144, 144B.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=70575</link>
    <description>Role of AO as adjudicator in making the computation - Assessment made u/s 147 r.w.s. 144 and 144B - It is clear that the Parliament intended the AO to be both investigator, for purpose of detecting income having escaped assessment and adjudicator, for making the best judgment assessment. - AO abdicated his role as adjudicator in making the computation - Matter restored back - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2023 08:42:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2023 14:31:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=717640" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Assessing Officer&#039;s Dual Role in Income Tax: Investigator vs. Adjudicator u/ss 147, 144, 144B.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=70575</link>
      <description>Role of AO as adjudicator in making the computation - Assessment made u/s 147 r.w.s. 144 and 144B - It is clear that the Parliament intended the AO to be both investigator, for purpose of detecting income having escaped assessment and adjudicator, for making the best judgment assessment. - AO abdicated his role as adjudicator in making the computation - Matter restored back - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2023 08:42:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=70575</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>