<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 103 - CESTAT Bangalore</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33122</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order and allowing the appeal. It held that handling charges collected for physical delivery of shares were not part of the taxable value for Service Tax purposes in stock broker services, aligning with precedent. The Tribunal determined that these charges were distinct from commission or brokerage for securities, thus exempt from taxation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 15:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71757" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 103 - CESTAT Bangalore</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33122</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order and allowing the appeal. It held that handling charges collected for physical delivery of shares were not part of the taxable value for Service Tax purposes in stock broker services, aligning with precedent. The Tribunal determined that these charges were distinct from commission or brokerage for securities, thus exempt from taxation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33122</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>