<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 1039 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439465</link>
    <description>The petition challenging the notice issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year 2016-17 was successful. The Court ruled that the notice issued to the non-existent entity post-amalgamation was illegal and lacked jurisdiction. Citing relevant precedents, the Court emphasized that once a company is amalgamated, it ceases to exist independently, rendering any notice in its name invalid. The impugned notice was quashed, allowing the respondents to take appropriate action within the bounds of the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2023 11:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=717550" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 1039 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439465</link>
      <description>The petition challenging the notice issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year 2016-17 was successful. The Court ruled that the notice issued to the non-existent entity post-amalgamation was illegal and lacked jurisdiction. Citing relevant precedents, the Court emphasized that once a company is amalgamated, it ceases to exist independently, rendering any notice in its name invalid. The impugned notice was quashed, allowing the respondents to take appropriate action within the bounds of the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439465</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>